Close
Access the latest news, analysis and trends impacting your business.
Explore our insights by topic:
Additional Broadridge resource:
View our Contact Us page for additional information.
Welcome back, {firstName lastName}.
Not {firstName}? Clear the form.
Additional Broadridge resource:
Your submission has been received. We will contact you soon.
One of our sales representatives will contact you about your submission.
Welcome back, {firstName lastName}.
Not {firstName}? Clear the form.
Want to speak with a sales representative?
Your sales rep submission has been received. One of our sales representatives will contact you soon.
View our Client Support page for additional client resources.
Welcome back, {firstName lastName}.
Not {firstName}? Clear the form.
View our Client Support page for additional client resources, or our Contact Us page for company information.
Your submission has been received. One of our customer service representatives will contact you soon.
Looking at the fund industry, it’s not hard to find statistics that would seem to spell doom for actively managed funds.
Passive (or index tracking) investments are getting a lot of positive press for their ability to deliver low-cost, tax-efficient performance to retail and institutional investors alike. However, they can't offer all of the benefits of actively managed funds. There are many reasons to consider both.
For comparison, Broadridge has developed a comprehensive scorecard to provide directors with a detailed overview of performance and trends across both active and passive funds.
