Close
Additional Broadridge resources:
View our Contact Us page for additional information.
One of our sales representatives will email you about your submission.
Welcome back, {firstName lastName}.
Not {firstName}? Clear the form.
Want to speak with a sales representative?
Your sales rep submission has been received. One of our sales representatives will contact you soon.
Our representatives and specialists are ready with the solutions you need to advance your business.
Want to speak with a sales representative?
| Table Heading | |
|---|---|
| +1 800 353 0103 | North America |
| +442075513000 | EMEA |
| +65 6438 1144 | APAC |
Your sales rep submission has been received. One of our sales representatives will contact you soon.
Want to speak with a sales representative?
| Table Heading | |
|---|---|
| +1 800 353 0103 | North America |
| +442075513000 | EMEA |
| +65 6438 1144 | APAC |
Looking at the fund industry, it’s not hard to find statistics that would seem to spell doom for actively managed funds.
Passive (or index tracking) investments are getting a lot of positive press for their ability to deliver low-cost, tax-efficient performance to retail and institutional investors alike. However, they can't offer all of the benefits of actively managed funds. There are many reasons to consider both.
For comparison, Broadridge has developed a comprehensive scorecard to provide directors with a detailed overview of performance and trends across both active and passive funds.
