Broadridge’s Paul Chiappetta, vice president of product management, and Bonita Blaney, senior director product management, review the advantages offered by intraday repo and how new technologies are changing the dynamic to allow a new go-to source of short-term funding.

The development of intraday repo could represent one of the most important innovations in the history of global repo trading. Until very recently, intraday repo was almost exclusively restricted to certain forms of central bank repo. Today, major banks such as J.P. Morgan, UBS and DBS are executing intraday repos on systems such as Broadridge’s Distributed Ledger Repo (DLR) and J.P. Morgan’s Onyx.

Both systems use distributed ledger technology (DLT) that provides the velocity, transparency and security needed to make intraday repo possible. As other banks and buy-side firms explore extending their repo businesses to intraday trading, these DLT solutions appear poised to transform the market — and potentially save banks and brokers millions of dollars every year.

An Imperfect Tool

Repo has long been an essential tool for managing liquidity. Throughout the course of a day, banks, broker-dealers and other market participants experience both predictable and unpredictable cash flows.

Predictable cash flows include securities settlement, the dollar legs of foreign exchange transactions, maturing loans or securities and corporate actions. Unpredictable cash flow events include margin calls from central counterparties (CCPs), new securities lending transactions, the cash-flow impact of settlement failures, and the transfer of funds by clients of banks and broker-dealers using gross settlement mechanisms such as Fedwire.

Figure 1

The hard-to-project nature of these intraday cash flows can result in clearing account deficits lasting minutes or hours. Even so-called “predictable” cash flows can contribute to deficits, since in many cases the precise timing of the cash-flow event within the business day is not known in advance.

Account deficits expose market participants to some significant costs. Daylight overdrafts are fees charged by the Federal Reserve to member banks for negative balances in an institution’s account at any point in a business day. If a bank is connected to Fedwire, the Federal Reserve guarantees to make payment with daylight overdraft — non-banks can also have daylight overdrafts on their clearing accounts.

Collateralized forms of borrowing and lending, such as overnight repo, help market participants avoid deficits and daylight overdrafts, reducing credit risk for the lender and interest charges for the borrower. Funds lent against high-quality collateral such as treasuries can be delivered almost instantly. However, overnight repo transactions are hardly an ideal solution in that the bank or broker-dealer is often stuck paying the cost of overnight interest to cover account deficits that may only last minutes.

In 2021, the Federal Reserve of New York reviewed data from the Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (FICC) and general collateral finance (GCF) markets to analyze the timing of overnight repo trades, or trades in which the near leg settles today and the far leg settles the following business day. The study found that the majority of “overnight” trades are executed in the early morning. Almost two-thirds of treasury FICC delivery-versus-payment (DvP) repo volume was completed between 07:00 (when the market opened) and 08:30. In overnight treasury GCF, 62 per cent was completed by 08:30. For both markets, around 90 per cent of trading was completed by midday.

So why are so many banks and broker-dealers looking to secure overnight funding so early in the day? According to the Fed report: “The factor that market participants most consistently cite is the start of daylight overdraft fees assessed by clearing banks at 08:30 to dealers that have not funded their clearing accounts. These fees are particularly meaningful for smaller, independent broker-dealers that raise a substantial portion of their funding in interdealer repo. Therefore, smaller dealers make every effort to fund as early as possible.”

These results suggest that banks and broker-dealers could be spending millions of dollars for overnight funding that they would not need if they had access to shorter-term funding.